Learn Crypto 🎓

Malta Rejects EU Push to Hand Crypto Oversight to ESMA

Malta Financial Services Authority MFSA

Malta Opposes Expanding ESMA’s Role

Malta’s financial regulator has voiced opposition to proposals from France, Italy and Austria to hand more supervisory powers over crypto firms to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). A spokesperson for the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) said Tuesday that while Malta supports supervisory convergence across the EU, it does not back centralisation.

“We believe that centralisation at this stage would only introduce an additional layer of bureaucracy, which could hinder efficiency during a period when the EU is actively striving to enhance its competitiveness,” the MFSA said in emailed comments.

Investor Takeaway

Malta’s stance underscores deep divisions in Europe over MiCA enforcement. For firms viewking licences, the debate could affect how uniform—or fragmented—the EU market really becomes.

France’s Hardline Warning on Passporting

The push for ESMA oversight comes later than France’s regulator, the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), warned it may challenge licences granted by other EU states. Under MiCA, firms can apply for authorisation in one member state and “passport” it across the bloc. France argues some companies are exploiting lighter regimes to gain easier access.

AMF chief Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani told Reuters that France could consider refusing such passports—calling it an “atomic weapon” that would threaten the EU’s single-market principle but remains on the table.

Legal Experts Split on Feasibility

Lawyers are divided on whether France could follow through. Marina Markezic of the European Crypto Initiative said that while blocking passporting is legally complex, it is technically possible. She warned that the debate signals “growing tensions over how MiCA should be enforced.”

But others disagree. Edwin Mata, lawyer and CEO of Brickken, argued that “legally, the AMF cannot block a duly MiCA-licensed entity from operating in France.” He noted that MiCA, as a regulation, applies uniformly across the EU, leaving no room for unilateral bans. Instead, France can monitor conduct, raise concerns, and escalate to ESMA, but not directly bar licensed companies.

Mata suggested the AMF’s comments serve more as a warning to firms trying to structure products under MiCA that should fall under MiFID II, Europe’s securities market framework.

Investor Takeaway

The clash highlights uncertainty for crypto firms banking on MiCA’s passporting promise. Legal clarity will be key as firms like Coinbase and Gemini expand under the regime.

MiCA’s Growing Pains

MiCA was designed to harmonize digital asset regulation across the EU and came into effect in 2024 for service providers. But its rollout has exposed inconsistencies in how national regulators apply the rules. France, Italy and Austria argue this fragmentation risks investor protection, while Malta insists decentralised supervision avoids red tape.

Any shift to centralised oversight at ESMA would require legislative changes to MiCA, reopening political negotiations that could bring further uncertainty for the industry. For now, crypto companies face a patchwork of interpretations, with their ability to scale across Europe dependent on how the passporting debate unfolds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button