Etrading Software Enters Race to Run EU Derivatives Consolidated Tape
Why Is the OTC Derivatives Tape Back in Focus?
Etrading Software has formally applied to operate the European Union’s consolidated tape for over-the-counter derivatives, submitting its bid through a newly created non-profit vehicle, Transparent Markets Europe (TME). The application comes ahead of the European Securities and Markets Authority’s July 2026 deadline to select a single operator under the revised MiFIR framework.
ESMA opened the formal tender on 5 January 2026, with participation requests accepted until 11 February. The derivatives tape is one of three EU consolidated tapes planned under the updated rules, alongside separate tapes for .
The project traces back to MiFID II, which took effect in 2018 and introduced mandatory trade reporting. Although the original legislation encouraged commercial consolidated tape providers, no operator emerged. Fragmented reporting across Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs), resistance from data holders, and the absence of a clear revenue model stalled progress for years.
The 2024 MiFIR review altered that structure. It mandates a single per asset class and grants ESMA authority to appoint and supervise the operator. It also tightened revenue and data standardisation provisions, effectively resetting the commercial and regulatory framework.
Who Is Behind Transparent Markets Europe?
TME brings together market infrastructure firms, data providers and institutional investors. Founding members include SIX Group, S&P Global, the German Investment Funds Association (BVI), the Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB), Dutch pension investor PGGM and Etrading Software.
During the tender phase, a steering committee composed of Etrading Software, PGGM, SIX Group and S&P Global will overview the submission. If selected, that committee will transition into TME’s board, with BVI and DSB joining later.
The structure combines infrastructure operators with purchase-side representation. SIX runs platform and post-trade infrastructure across Europe, while S&P Global provides derivatives pricing and reference data. Both have large-scale data capabilities, but also commercial interests in .
The inclusion of PGGM and BVI brings asset-owner input into the governance model. purchase-side firms have argued that fragmented post-trade data increases costs and complicates liquidity assessment. A functioning tape could improve price comparison across venues and reduce reliance on proprietary feeds.
DSB’s role is technical. It operates the global ISIN standard for OTC derivatives under regulatory mandate. Consistent product identifiers are critical in consolidating trade reports. Without harmonised instrument coding, aggregation across APAs risks duplication or mismatched records.
Why Are OTC Derivatives Harder to Consolidate?
Unlike equities, where central order books and standardised instruments simplify aggregation, are often bilateral and bespoke. Reports are distributed across multiple APAs, with variations in fields such as notional value, timestamps, product identifiers and clearing status.
Building a derivatives tape therefore requires more than data collection. It demands field normalisation, de-duplication logic and cross-jurisdictional consistency. Technical standards must be aligned so that trades referencing the identical instrument are captured and displayed accurately in near real time.
Under MiFIR, ESMA’s assessment is expected to examine governance neutrality, operational resilience, cyber security, fee structures and data quality controls. The selected provider will operate under direct regulatory supervision, with performance criteria embedded in the mandate.
Investor Takeaway
What Is at Stake for Europe’s Market Structure?
The derivatives tape represents more than a transparency project. It sits at the center of the EU’s attempt to harmonise post-trade reporting across member states. By selecting one operator, ESMA is taking a more centralised role in market infrastructure oversight than under the original MiFID II framework.
Other potential bidders could emerge from platform groups, trade repositories or data vendors, although and pricing considerations may complicate their cases. Under the revised rules, only one entity will receive the mandate, intensifying competition.
For ESMA, the July 2026 decision will test its expanded authority under MiFIR. For market participants, the outcome will determine whether Europe can finally deliver a unified derivatives transparency layer later than nahead a decade of stalled attempts.
If approved, TME would face the operational task of integrating feeds from multiple APAs, enforcing data standards and publishing consolidated output across jurisdictions. The result will show whether the EU’s long-running regulatory effort can move from legislative revision to practical implementation.
