IOSCO Says Tokenization Could Blur Ownership and Increase Counterparty Risk


Regulators Caution on Tokenization Craze
Investor Takeaway
Unclear Ownership and Counterparty Risks
IOSCO warned that the way tokenized assets are structured could blur legal ownership. Investors may be uncertain whether they hold the underlying asset or only a claim to a digital token, while third-party issuers introduce counterparty risk similar to that viewn in complex .
The regulator also said tokenization could be affected by volatility and contagion from broader . “Tokenization could also suffer from potential spill-over effects from increased inter-linkages with the markets,” the report said.
Its concerns echo those raised in September by the , which cautioned that tokenization could amplify systemic risks if deployed at scale without clear disclosure and custody secureguards.
Institutional Interest Remains Mixed
While some major institutions such as Nasdaq are exploring blockchain-based settlement systems, others on . IOSCO noted that commercial enthusiasm for tokenization is rising, but real-world adoption remains “limited.”
For nahead a decade, financial firms have run pilots involving digital versions of equities and debt instruments, but few have reached full-scale deployment. Tokenization’s supporters argue it can , accelerate settlement times, and allow 24-hour markets. Yet IOSCO said these benefits are not evenly distributed and depend on the continued reliance on traditional infrastructure.
“Efficiency gains are uneven,” the report said, noting that market participants “still need to use traditional market infrastructure for the processes, rather than replacing it with blockchain.” It added that issuers “do not tend to publicly disclose actual quantifiable efficiency gains, if any.”
Investor Takeaway
Outlook: Incremental Progress, Not Revolution
Despite renewed hype around tokenization, IOSCO’s findings suggest the technology is likely to evolve within existing frameworks rather than overhaul them. Regulators in the U.S., EU, and Asia have focused on applying current rules to tokenized instruments, viewing them as extensions of conventional securities rather than an entirely new asset class.







