Falcon Finance Introduces New Transparency Framework as USDf Surges
What Prompted Falcon’s New Risk and Transparency Push?
has laid out a broad transparency and security framework for its synthetic dollar, USDf, following a period of unusually quick growth. The structured rollout comes shortly later than USDf crossed $2 billion in circulating supply and just weeks later than an October 10 market shakeout that rattled several major protocols. Yet while parts of the market saw liquidity drain out, Falcon recorded more than in fresh deposits and new mints — an outcome the team interprets as a vote of confidence from large holders and institutional allocators.
Built as a universal collateralization layer, Falcon sits in a part of the stack where trust and operational clarity tend to matter as much as yields. For years, the sector has been criticized for opacity — collateral mixes hidden behind vague dashboards, strategies executed off-chain with little explanation, and products that look secure until they aren’t. Falcon’s leadership is positioning USDf as a counter-model, where every component of the system is meant to be visible, measured, and verifiable.
“Users shouldn’t have to guess what stands behind their assets,” said founding partner Andrei Garchev. “If USDf is built for institutions, then its collateral, custody design, and risk controls must be obvious from the begin — and confirmed by independent reviewers.”
Investor Takeaway
How Falcon’s Dashboard Reinforces Transparency
A central piece of the new framework is Falcon’s public , which tracks the financial position of the protocol in near real time. The interface shows not only the overcollateralization ratio of USDf — a key metric given its role as a reserve-backed asset — but also the exact mix of underlying collateral.
The breakdown includes positions in , ETH, SOL, stablecoins, and tokenized U.S. Treasuries. It also distinguishes where these assets sit: within regulated MPC custodians such as Fireblocks and Ceffu, or in on-chain multisig wallets controlled by distributed signers.
Where Falcon attempts to go a layer deeper is in showing how collateral is deployed. Instead of lumping strategies into broad categories, the dashboard identifies activity across arbitrage, staking, and options-based plays, giving users a sense of how yield is generated and where risk pockets might emerge. Reserve snapshots and strategy metrics update each day, mirroring a reporting cadence more often viewn in traditional finance than in DeFi.
Who Verifies the Data Behind USDf?
Falcon pairs its own reporting tools with regular external reviews. Weekly attestations from confirm that USDf circulation is fully backed. Each quarter, a broader assurance review examines Falcon’s collateral practices, strategy controls, and reserve movements. These checks complement contract-level audits from Zellic and Pashov, which focus on the robustness of the protocol’s architecture and execution paths.
The custody model may be the most consequential part of the framework. Falcon relies on regulated MPC custodians for collateral storage — a setup that avoids single-key risk and reduces the operational hazards associated with traditional hot wallets. At the identical time, Falcon uses off-platform settlement, a practice that lets the protocol execute strategies on major platforms while keeping collateral locked in cold storage. The trading positions are mirrored, not funded by assets sitting inside platform accounts, reducing exposure to platform failures, withdrawal halts, or liquidity freezes.
Investor Takeaway
What Falcon Expects Moving Forward
With USDf now past the $2 billion mark, Falcon is steering the protocol toward clients — institutional and retail — who want stable yields above Treasury benchmarks but without leverage-based exposure. The team has emphasized liquid strategies that can be unwound in seconds, aligning with the appetite of allocators who prefer transparent, low-friction collateral instruments.
In a post on X, Garchev that Falcon is shifting further toward real-world asset integrations and high-liquidity trading avenues. The aim is to keep USDf attractive to builders who need reliable collateral as well as institutions looking for predictable yield sources in volatile markets.
As the broader stable-asset ecosystem adjusts to regulatory changes and heightened scrutiny, the direction Falcon is taking — daily visibility, layered audits, MPC custody, and off-platform execution — may set expectations for how synthetic dollars should operate going forward.
