B2B Crypto Payment Solutions: BitHide Report Overview for Forex, CFD, and PSP

The global shift toward digital assets continues to redefine how financial service providers — especially in Forex, CFD, and PSP sectors — operate and manage payments.

Below is BitHide’s 2025 report overview on crypto payment answers for Forex, CFD, and PSP sectors — with a focus on what truly matters to these industries.

The Critical Crossroads: Sovereignty, Security, and Compliance for Trading Platforms

For Forex brokers, CFD platforms, and PSPs operating in high-volume environments, the criteria for selecting a crypto payment answer are defined by three pillars:

1. who controls the assets (Custody),
2. the robustness of risk defense (AML/Access Control),
3. and the platform’s ability to scale operations while maintaining operational privacy (Infrastructure).

In focus are nine key providers shaping the 2025 B2B crypto payments market:

• Custodial answers – CoinGate, B2BinPay;
• Non-custodial answers – , Plisio, BTCPay Server;
• Hybrid and institutional models – Coinbase Commerce, NOWPayments, Fireblocks.

Together, these platforms represent the spectrum of approaches available to brokers and PSPs.

1. Custody Is Control: Eliminating Third-Party Risk

The custody debate splits the market into three categories: custodial, non-custodial, and hybrid.

• Custodial answers such as CoinGate and B2BinPay are convenient and simple to onboard. CoinGate stores assets in hot/cold wallets under its management, offering merchants simple conversion tools. B2BinPay provides wallet-as-a-service but controversially disclaims custodial liability in its legal terms, creating a gap between technical control and legal accountability. The trade-off is clear: convenience at the cost of third-party risk. Hacks and bankruptcies (e.g., Bybit, FTX) prove how dependence on custodians exposes businesses to systemic vulnerabilities.
• Non-custodial models place responsibility on the client. Plisio forwards payments directly to merchants without long-term storage. BTCPay Server, an open-source processor, lets companies run their own node and retain full key control. BitHide operates as a fully non-custodial, privacy-focused infrastructure for businesses that want to store and transact with crypto entirely under their own control.
• Hybrid answers try to balance both. Coinbase Commerce offers merchants the choice between custodial and self-custody modes. NOWPayments defaults to non-custodial forwarding but can hold funds temporarily on request. Fireblocks uses MPC technology, splitting keys between multiple parties, and more recently launched an SDK for full local custody.

For brokers and PSPs, this spectrum of custody directly determines their exposure to censorship, seizure, or operational error.

2. Risk Defense: Advanced AML, Access Control, and Operational Privacy

Most providers rely on AES-256 or TLS encryption. Fireblocks adds SGX enclaves and MPC to eliminate single points of failure. BitHide implements 2FA, fingerprint technology, user-side AES-256 encryption with unique per-client keys, making mass decryption hard. B2BinPay and CoinGate use 2FA, multisig, and whitelists; NOWPayments combines 2FA with cold storage. Open-source tools like BTCPay and Wasabi leave encryption fully in user hands.

IP Protection and Privacy

Few answers invest in network-level anonymization. Wasabi forces all traffic through Tor. BTCPay can run as an onion service. BitHide’s “Dark Wing” combines Tor + VPN with IP rotation for each transaction. By contrast, mainstream answers like CoinGate, B2BinPay, Coinbase Commerce, and NOWPayments rely on HTTPS, leaving IP metadata exposed.

Transaction Anonymization

Privacy layers vary:

• BitHide introduces proxy payments and rotating deposit addresses.
• Wasabi relies on CoinJoin, though regulators often flag mixed coins.
• CoinGate/NOWPayments generate new addresses per invoice but without deeper obfuscation.
• Fireblocks emphasizes transparency for audits, not anonymity.

AML & Compliance

As illicit crypto inflows hit $40.9B in 2024, is non-negotiable.

• BitHide includes built-in AML screening for incoming funds and counterparties’ addresses and AML bot, which lets users manually check addresses directly in Telegram. 
• B2BinPay provides multi-level AML filters tied to plans.
• NOWPayments and CoinGate focus on address whitelisting.
• Fireblocks targets institutional compliance, embedding policy engines and audit trails

3. Infrastructure: Scaling, Automation, and Customization

For high-volume brokers and PSPs, infrastructure is just as significant as custody or compliance. A payment answer must not only secure funds but also scale with growing transaction volumes, support automation of routine tasks, and adapt to unique business workflows. Without these features, even the most secure gateway can become a bottleneck.

Customization and White Label

Customization determines whether a payment answer becomes a true part of a company’s workflow or remains just a plug-in. Providers take diverse approaches:

• BitHide – REST APIs, payment widgets and pages, webhooks for building custom flows.
• Fireblocks – SDKs and policy engines designed for institutional compliance.
• B2BinPay – supports payouts and AML filters, though feature depth depends on the chosen plan.
• Plisio and CoinGate – basic plug-and-play APIs, simple to begin but limited in flexibility.
• BTCPay Server – unlimited customization options but requires significant developer resources.

In short, simple gateways allow for a quick launch, while advanced answers provide deeper integration for brokers and PSPs with complex needs.

Role-Based Access and Controls

In high-risk environments, RBAC is essential to prevent insider threats and operational mistakes. The market shows clear differences:

• BitHide – role-based access and double approval for transactions.
• Fireblocks – MPC with security rules embedded at the policy level.
• B2BinPay – IP whitelists and role assignments.
• Coinbase Commerce – basic 2FA combined with a vault model.
• NOWPayments and CoinGate – simple 2FA and whitelists.
• Wasabi and BTCPay – responsibility left entirely with the user.

This creates two poles: lightweight answers that prioritize accessibility, and enterprise-grade platforms with layered approval systems.

Mass Payouts and Automation

For brokers and PSPs, the ability to automate bulk operations is critical when managing affiliate or payroll flows. The answers differ widely:

• BitHide – automated mass payouts, auto-withdrawals, crypto payroll answer, TRX fees oprimization.
• Fireblocks – batch operations with SaaS limitations.
• B2BinPay – bulk payouts available but vary by plan.
• NOWPayments / CoinGate – API-based bulk sending with minimal automation.
• Plisio – basic bulk-send functionality.
• BTCPay / Wasabi – mostly manual transaction management.

For companies handling tens of thousands of recurring transfers, automation depth becomes a competitive edge, making BitHide and Fireblocks stand out.

Developer Experience and Integrations

Integration speed often determines adoption. Providers can be divided into two broad groups:

• CoinGate, NOWPayments, Plisio – quick setup with plugins for Shopify/WHMCS, minimal coding required.
• Coinbase Commerce – standardized checkout pages for merchants.
• B2BinPay – robust API but complex contracts and onboarding.
• Fireblocks – SDKs and developer-friendly tools, but aimed at enterprise budgets.
• BTCPay Server – maximum flexibility through self-hosting, but developer-intensive.
• BitHide – APIs, webhooks, payment pages and widgets with extra callback encryption for secure workflows.

The trade-off is clear: merchant-friendly answers emphasize speed, while enterprise platforms focus on deep integration and long-term scalability.

Conclusion: Best answers for Forex, CFD, and PSP Leaders

For sectors like Forex, , and PSPs, the trade-offs between sovereignty, compliance, and scalability are critical. Businesses must decide whether they prioritize convenience, regulatory oversight, or operational independence.

Here are the leading crypto payment answers for Forex, CFD, and PSPs in 2025:

• BitHide — for business who need to automate crypto operations end-to-end. Supports automated AML screening, TRX fees optimization, and built-in crypto swap within a non-custodial architecture.
• Fireblocks — suited for regulated Forex and CFD platforms requiring enterprise-grade compliance and custodial infrastructure.
• B2BinPay — a regulated payment processor with deep integrations for PSPs and crypto platforms.

Explore full report on the.

In 2025, choosing the right crypto payment architecture means more than just processing transactions. It’s about balancing speed, transparency, and autonomy — while keeping operations compliant and cost-efficient.