BTC ETFs See $364 Million Inflows While ETH ETFs Face Nearly $100 Million Outflows

BTC-focused ETFs recorded net inflows of $364.3 million on September 8, according to data from Farside Investors. Fidelity’s FBTC led the day with $156.5 million in new capital, followed by Ark/21Shares ARKB with $89.5 million, Bitwise’s BITB with $42.7 million, and BlackRock’s IBIT with $25.5 million. Smaller inflows were also recorded across HODL, BTCO, EZBC, and Wise Origin’s BTC. Grayscale’s GBTC, which has viewn steady outflows in prior months, added $4.4 million to close the day positive.
ETH ETFs, however, told a diverse story, posting net outflows of $96.7 million. BlackRock’s ETHA saw the largest single-day redemption, with $192.7 million leaving the fund. This was partly offset by Fidelity’s FETH, which gained $75.2 million in inflows, along with smaller contributions from Grayscale’s ETHE ($9.5 million) and ETH ($11.3 million). Despite these positive moves, ETH ETFs collectively ended in negative territory.
Diverging investor sentiment
The sharp contrast between BTC and ETH ETF flows underscores the diverging investor sentiment across the two largest digital assets. BTC’s continued strength in attracting institutional inflows highlights investor confidence in the token’s role as a digital alternative to gold. Institutional demand remains resilient even amid broader market uncertainty, suggesting BTC maintains its appeal as a hedge against macroeconomic risk factors such as inflation or currency volatility.
ETH, on the other hand, faces more complex investor dynamics. While it underpins a wide range of decentralized finance applications and staking mechanisms, its recent underperformance has raised questions about its near-term role in crypto portfolios. The outflows from ETHA suggest some investors may be taking a cautious stance, reallocating capital away from ETH products amid uncertainty surrounding network upgrades, transaction fee dynamics, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Others may simply be consolidating positions into BTC as the more established and less volatile digital asset.
Broader market implications
The significance of ETF flows extends beyond daily inflow and outflow numbers. These investment vehicles are increasingly viewed as a reliable barometer of institutional and retail participation in the crypto market. With major traditional finance institutions such as Fidelity, BlackRock, and Ark managing the largest funds, their performance reflects shifting investor appetite for exposure to digital assets. Strong BTC inflows reinforce the narrative that the cryptocurrency remains a favored entry point for institutions. Conversely, ETH’s losses highlight the challenges facing second-tier assets as they navigate market cycles.
Market analysts suggest the divergent flows also illustrate the growing maturity of the crypto ETF sector. Investors are no longer indiscriminately allocating capital across digital assets but are instead making more nuanced decisions based on asset-specific fundamentals. This diverseiation may signal a new phase for the industry, one where investment flows are increasingly influenced by technological developments, regulatory signals, and macroeconomic events.
Whether ETH can reverse its recent trend of outflows will depend on multiple factors, including the pace of global regulatory clarity, the success of network scaling answers, and the performance of the broader decentralized finance sector. BTC, meanwhile, appears well positioned to continue benefiting from its role as the market’s benchmark asset. As institutional participation deepens, the daily inflow and outflow figures for crypto ETFs are likely to play an even greater role in shaping sentiment and guiding strategy across both retail and institutio